Can Young People and People of Color Really Win, Win With A Meta-Brand?

 I just got home from the Take Back the American Dream Conference, and I have been pondering the role of meta-brands as vehicles of change for our movement, but specifically for young people and people of color.

I have been thinking about the examples laid out by Van at the conference, assessing our conversation about #occupywallstreet, analyzing our historical struggles in America, and even trying to refresh my memory about international movements for change.

I know that during the most recent progressive meta-movement that Van laid out, the 2008 Obama campaign, young people and people of color were often the ground troops and swing votes that put the campaign over the top, but will likely be the last groups to truly benefit from the fruits of this struggle. In fact, I was recently told by a White House staffer that no one in DC fears youth orgs or the black grassroots, even though the turnout numbers in 2008 indicate that these important constituencies are indomitable forces. Not surprisingly, these groups suffer from breathtaking unemployment and unprecedented debt.

… Continue Reading

Posted by:

Biko Baker

Van Jones’ Green Dream Deferred: Cornel West, Malia Lazu and More

In 2008, Time Magazine named Van Jones one of its “Heroes of the Environment” for his work as a climate activist dedicated to the creation of an inclusive green economy. In March of 2009, Jones was appointed by President Barack Obama to be Special Adviser for Green Jobs, a new position to develop environmentally-conscious industry and employment around the country.

Jones’ work in the Green movement was derailed in July of 2009 by controversy over his past political activities and allegations of ties to Marxist organizations and 9/11 “Truthers.” Only two months after the scandal broke, Jones gracefully resigned from his post.

No one has been appointed to replace him.

We asked some of America’s leading thinkers and political activists one simple question:

What would the Green Movement look like if Van Jones were still in the White House?

• Dr. Cornel West
• Julian Mocine-McQueen
• Malia Lazu
• Ethan Case
• Chuck Creekmur

Dr. Cornel West: Professor at Princeton University/ prominent intellectual 

“Van Jones means so much to me. He was here at Princeton. I have a great love and great respect for him.

I would say that if Van Jones was in the White House, there would be a strong prophetic voice for poor and working people and a brilliant progressive figure conversant with the constraints of public policy. This unique combination of idealism and realism trumps any vulgar cynicism too often operative in the White House.”

Julian Mocine-McQueen: San Francisco League of Young Voters

“I think that having Van in the White House was an incredible opportunity to have a true visionary help set a course for green economic development and sustainability. Having said that, I truly believe that Van’s values and vision are still represented by many of the president’s advisers and President Obama himself. I think that the political climate, as it exists now, will make it hard for the president to set a really innovative path. The effects of big money and lobbyists are still incredibly strong with or without Van.

I think the only way we’ll be able to see the president act out the vision of someone like Van is to strengthen the people’s movement. Van was cool because he was bringing the people’s voice, but he was only one person. It is our duty as citizens and activists to use our voice and our numbers to demand that the country get serious about prioritizing the transition to a green and just economy.”

Malia Lazu: MIT Fellow leading at the Urban Labs

“The idea that diversity at every level of decision-making will promote a healthy democracy is a core belief of progressive politics. However, diversity only brings benefits when different thinking is given a real voice in the strategic process. There was hope that change in the White House would mean a change on how politics is done. Hires of thoughtful leaders like Van Jones and Patrick Gespard represent a new set of ideas and political solutions that would help invite the most oppressed in this country to be educated and get meaningful employment by rebuilding their communities.

Lobbyists and money heavily influence White House strategy. I do not believe the White House, as an institution, allows for experts like Van Jones to push for a more radical political strategy. Van is a strong leader, who is well-respected in the streets and beltway, I would dare suggest, he is in a better position to influence White House policy now that he is no longer there.”

Ethan Case: Development Director at SustainUS

“I work with SustainUS, a youth-led, volunteer-run group advancing sustainable development through youth empowerment and I have had a growing sense over the past few months that young people are fed up with the state of environmental justice. We need concrete steps toward a future where our generation and our children are not suffering from the devastating effects of poisoned water, dirty air, and climate change. Recently, young environmental leaders like Courtney Hight have openly criticized the president, while Tim DeChristopher and others have called for young people to participate in acts of civil disobedience to communicate the demand for environmental justice to our unresponsive leaders.

If Van Jones were still working for the White House, We might hear the president say something about how the immense cost of environmental inaction now will have a huge impact upon our generation later. We might hear the president talk about how mountain top removal is ruining the health of Appalachian citizens and we might hear the president say that the CO2 we burn today will mean the destruction of millions of homes in Bangladesh and the South Pacific in fifty year’s time.

If Van Jones were still around, we might see an administration upholding environmental justice rather than an administration asking us to wait until after the next election.”

Chuck Creekmur, CEO at Allhiphop.com
“I believe that Van Jones would have changed the face of the Green Movement in the way President Obama changed the way people see the presidency. Through the White House, he would have been able to introduce “being green” to an impoverished or ignorant segment of the population that wouldn’t normally care about the environment.

More importantly, Van Jones is a genius and a trailblazer that has applied his passion to the environmental causes. It’s unfortunate that he doesn’t have the President’s ear, because this is one of the most pressing issues facing our generation.”

The growing issues of our crippling addiction to oil and inefficient energy consumption are not going to solve themselves. It’s about time that President Obama brought some influential thinkers with big ideas to the table. In order to face the issues head-on, the administration needs a green leader who doesn’t just talk, but has the ability to motivate people to act. Who would you nominate to take Van Jones’ position?

This article was originally published by 99problems.org, a project of the League of Young Voters, in collaboration with YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions, of which Van Jones is a former contributing editor.

Posted by:

The Editor

Van Jones Drops Ad for Vote Again 2010

Posted by:

The Editor

Van Jones Writes Op-Ed About Shirley Sherrod

Originally posted at Nytimes.com

I UNDERSTAND how Shirley Sherrod, the Agriculture Department official who was forced to resign last week, must have felt

Last year I, too, resigned from an administration job, after I uttered some ill-chosen words about the Republican Party and was accused — falsely — of signing my name to a petition being passed around by 9/11 conspiracy theorists. Partisan Web sites and pundits pounced, and I, too, saw my name go from obscurity to national infamy within hours.

Our situations aren’t exactly the same. Ms. Sherrod’s comments, in which she, a black woman, appeared to admit to racial discrimination against a white couple, were taken far out of context, while I truly did use a vulgarity.

But the way we were treated is strikingly similar, and it reveals a lot about the venal nature of Washington politics in the Internet era. In my case, the media rushed to judgment so quickly that I was never able to make clear that the group put my name on its Web site without my permission. The group finally admitted that it never had my signature, but by then it was too late.

Fortunately, Ms. Sherrod has been offered a new job. But our stories offer cautionary tales to anyone interested in taking a job in national politics.

Read the rest here.

spotted on K-Mos’ Facebook page.

Posted by:

The Editor

Van Jones Talks About His “Rough Exit” from the White House

The last time Van Jones spoke at a Campus Progress National Convention, he was an environmental adviser in the White House — “and now I’m not,” he said at this year’s conference Wednesday. “That sucks.”

But despite his self-described “rough exit” from the White House last September, he said he wouldn’t trade the experience for anything.

“What I learned in those six months [in the White House] I am going to be able to take with me forever,” he said addressing a group of 1,200 young liberal activists at the Campus Progress national conference in downtown Washington. It was Jones’ first high-profile remarks about his White House experience.

“If you were given the same opportunity I was to go and serve for six months, and it was 100 percent guaranteed that you’d have the same rough exit that I had, do it — it’s worth every minute,” he said.

(jacked via politico)
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/39476.html#ixzz0t6m7HvrU

Posted by:

The Editor